FANDOM

20,055 Pages

D0raemon

Admin
  • I live in Singapore
A FANDOM user
  Loading editor
  • Hello D0raemon. I was wondering if we should keep Star Planet pages, seeing as how they've been removed from the game, and I don't think KMS has any plans to return it any time soon.

      Loading editor
    • All contents, removed or not, are part of MapleStory and should be recorded on the Wiki. This is how it is done on other Wikis too ("Removed Contents" or "Cut Contents").

        Loading editor
    • Only in certain cases; it's not worth the extra effort to maintain data that will never be relevant, otherwise we'd still have PVP skill data.

        Loading editor
    • "Maintaining" those data is at most putting notifications on the pages that they have been removed in-game, and that's not a lot of effort.

      Removed contents are not totally irrelevant too, they are part of what was MapleStory, and should be recorded here. We can't just remove them entirely for the sake of our convenience/liking.

      That said, if you are insistent on removing them, a compromise may be a summary page on removed contents, without the individual pages.

        Loading editor
    • I'm definitely okay with a summary page, as it gives a general idea of what the areas were before they were removed. Of course, we'd have to update them if/when the areas come back, but that's no hassle.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Welcome back D0raemon, first of all.

    Second, I don't think that changing the main pages to singular is really necessary, since we're usually dealing with something that has more than one of a category (such as NPCs, as compared to a class).

      Loading editor
    • View all 16 replies
    • PS: Pages like Elixir don't even have their 'parent' page included in their names, which is a potential flaw I saw while looking into the quest pages issue. It indeed was poor planning (or lack thereof) from the start that caused all these problems.

        Loading editor
    • By category, I wasn't referring to the parent page, but rather categories such as Category:Silent Crusade Quests. I noticed that pages like [Silent Crusade] Chance? Or Fate? are left without a category due to this change (after I looked in the Uncategorized Pages log) since the QuestCat template automatically gives it a category based on the number you input in the page, but after I renamed it from "Quest" to "Quests", (like with [Silent Crusade] A Cry for Help) it was categorized again. I also tried to toy around with the QuestCat template to fix it, but it didn't change anything.

      I might take the second option just for this reason.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hi

    I'd like to start contibuting ;)

      Loading editor
  • I've been thinking about this for a while, and wanted your input on this: Do you think that we should keep the Admin/Manager skill pages, or do you think they can be deleted? Chances are, nobody who comes to this Wikia is interested in them, as they're only for GMs.

      Loading editor
    • If you ask me, I'd say that we should keep it. But I don't see how an unpopular page should be deleted though?

        Loading editor
    • Not necessarily just because it's unpopular, because it doesn't have that much of a purpose compared to other skill pages.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  •   Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Wat lvl are u and wat server

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Post a new message to D0raemon's wall

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hello, I'm FinalMix+ (obviously), a feel-like-it editor here on this wiki.

    There's an article that's filled with complete junk and is in dire need of a cleanup. By complete junk, I mean it has much fan-made references to it. I'm a bit busy IRL, so if you have the time, could you please clean that thing up?

    Mastema

    Reason why I'm making big fuss bout the page is because I created it. People messed it up. BADLY.

    Anyway, I look forward to helping out here, so do let me know if there's anything I can do.

    PS: I'm a GMS player.

      Loading editor
  • Update the ChineseMS to v101, please.

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Why do you block people who create articles? Just because they don't put much information in there doesn't mean they want to do any harm. They create articles so that we are reminded that this information needs to be expanded. We only block people who wish bad for this wikia and vandalize.

      Loading editor
    • Nope, if they really wished us to expand the information, they should at least leave the page blank or type something like "please expand this".

        Loading editor
    • They did type minor information about the article and just creating the article is enough I'm my opinion.

        Loading editor
    • You meant something like "ffweawgwa" and "I don't know" counts as minor information?

        Loading editor
    • No om saying you should focus on the real vandalisers and not the people who try to help by creating articles, it's not like they out any harmful in the articles, they just didn't know what to put in at that moment. Imagine yourself in their situation, would you like to get blocked in their situation? A database source cannot work without the community.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
See archived talk page
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.