Thread:Richmond2010/@comment-4156018-20121229111404/@comment-259642-20121229122508

It was not a "pen ranked #15". See http://maplestory.wikia.com/wiki/Sakura_Samurai. If it was pen15, I would give him a warning based on the current policy. Let's improve the policy, lest immature adults find loopholes and start to write stuff on articles.


 * For edits which are not quite sensible but has a connection to the game, either improve on it if it is credible, or revert the edit;
 * For edits which have absolutely no connection to the game, give a warning (the strikes thing still taking place);
 * For edits which are just utter nonsense (e.g. see title), give a block depending on seriousness.

That can actually improve the system by a bit, so what do you think?

This wiki has the two of us being active admins, and Fixin occasionally works behind the scenes. We also need to be careful in choosing an admin, since one admin can actually destroy the wiki in one night.

There was a wiki which I participated in (not a Wikia-hosted one, neither was I an admin) about 4 years ago. Apparently it started off with a vandal which spammed "Question (a name) is a cocksucker" into articles to test the water. There were only 3 admins and very low wiki activity, and they happen to live in the Western time zones. I think it was raided a few hours later.